Now that my self-imposed reading prison sentence is complete, I can take more time to make weird things, like homemade marshmallows to take to a New Year's Eve party. (I pronounce that word "marsh MELLows" not "marsh Mal-os". Please read along with my pronunciation to get the full effect of being here.)
Here's the Martha Stewart recipe that I'm following.
First, put some water and gelatin in a mixing bowl and let it collude to form a rubbery disk.
Meanwhile, boil up a bunch of sugar on the stove. I didn't take any photos of either of those steps. Just use your imagination!
Then, mix the rubber disk and the boiling sugar syrup together, and it creates a disgusting smell! You might shout, "Ew! Hot gelatin smells like the horse hooves it's made out of!" and make your loved one go, "WHAT? GELATIN IS MADE OF WHAT???" Then get your loved one to come over and smell it so you can both be grossed out together. Good thing you're taking them to a party, since neither of you finds marshmallows very appetizing now!
Mix it more and more furiously! It will eventually smell like marshmallows.
The mixer has to mix and mix until the motor wears out -- that's how you know they're done. In the meantime, think back to the first time you ever heard of anyone making their own marshmallows. For me, the woman was a rather controlling, possibly obsessive, and almost-always bossy person. And she may or may not have turned out to be kind of batshit, but that doesn't have to ruin marshmallows for the rest of us. SHE dipped them in melted chocolate (Martha doesn't even mention that idea but just shows a picture of a giant marshmallow floating on a cup of hot cocoa -- pretty pedestrian, Martha!)
Finally, when the stuff looks like taffy and your mixer is all clogged up, try to move the hoof+sugar from the mixing bowl and into a pan that has been previously both sprayed with cooking spray and lined with plastic wrap. Still, you will wind up sticky.
Smash the stuff down with a double-whammy top layer of plastic wrap sprayed with non-stick spray! Flatten it out; beat it into submission. Now let it sit calmly and think about what it did for two hours. Then you can cut it into pieces and cover them in chocolate, or put them in your hot chocolate, or make s'mores, or whatever.
Now, riddle me this, MARTHA! How the hell do I get the oh-so-sticky marshmallow stuff out of the mixing bowl???
...Oh, simply soaking it in water will eventually drain the sticky of all its power?
Okay, thanks.
Thursday, December 31, 2009
Book 104: The Pearl
Ah, the final book, finished at about 1:00 PM on 12/31/09, is John Steinbeck's The Pearl. What a great way to end the year. Steinbeck doesn't waste a word, and even though he tells a lot (rather than showing), he does it in a way that is mostly forgivable, and he intertwines the telling and the showing together, so it doesn't seem as much like cheating.
In this novel, a villager finds an enormous, perfect pearl in the Gulf and it changes everyone's lives. "Every man suddenly became related to Kino's pearl, and Kino's pearl went into the dreams, the speculations, the schemes, the plans, the futures, the wishes, the needs, the lusts, the hungers, of everyone, and only one person stood in the way and that was Kino, so that he became curiously every man's enemy."
Read these two sentences, and see if the idea seems true: "For it is said that humans are never satisfied, that you give them one thing and they want something more. And this is said in disparagement, whereas it is one of the greatest talents the species has and one that has made it superior to animals that are satisfied with what they have."
Well, this pearl is TOO big, and the pearl buyers try to cheat Kino. None of the villagers know how to bargain or how to go to the city to get a fair deal. But Kino will not be cheated. Someone comes in the night to try to steal the pearl. Kino's wife begs him to destroy it, to cleanse the family of its evil. But Kino has seen a future in which his son will go to school and learn to read and then they will all know the things that the Europeans know. They will know what is true.
Oh, that pearl seems to promise safety and security and never being hungry, and that is very difficult to resist.
Read this: "And the sun beat down on the streets of the city and even tiny stones threw shadows on the ground." What would you give to be able to write a sentence like that?
Here is another great tidbit from this novel: "He had said, 'I am a man,' and that meant certain things to Juana. It meant that he was half insane and half god." True dat, right sisters?
The thing that makes this book really great, aside from the talented and skillful writing, is that it rings completely true. Imagine if you won the lottery, and not just enough to pay off the bills, but some insanely huge amount, like $500 million. Some amount that would absolutely destroy your current life and send you hurtling into some other existence. Everyone knows you have the money, and they all want some of it -- and not a little bit. Does a little part of you hate them for their greed? Do you question everyone's motives in hanging around you? Do you have to shut yourself away from the world for security and safety? It's easy to imagine the bad side of sudden immense wealth. Steinbeck wrote something like, when we step into the sunlight, our shadow side is revealed as well. Something like The Pearl could bring out the worst in each of us.
Woo Hoo Hoo!! I completed my challenge of reading 104 books in 2009!! I'm pretty relieved to be done.
But... I have made a new challenge for myself for 2010. I hope it will begin some time tomorrow, and I think it will be a lot of fun, even though I'm just a little terrified.
Happy New Year's Eve! I hope you have fun and get home safely and get ready to start your resolutions tomorrow.
In this novel, a villager finds an enormous, perfect pearl in the Gulf and it changes everyone's lives. "Every man suddenly became related to Kino's pearl, and Kino's pearl went into the dreams, the speculations, the schemes, the plans, the futures, the wishes, the needs, the lusts, the hungers, of everyone, and only one person stood in the way and that was Kino, so that he became curiously every man's enemy."
Read these two sentences, and see if the idea seems true: "For it is said that humans are never satisfied, that you give them one thing and they want something more. And this is said in disparagement, whereas it is one of the greatest talents the species has and one that has made it superior to animals that are satisfied with what they have."
Well, this pearl is TOO big, and the pearl buyers try to cheat Kino. None of the villagers know how to bargain or how to go to the city to get a fair deal. But Kino will not be cheated. Someone comes in the night to try to steal the pearl. Kino's wife begs him to destroy it, to cleanse the family of its evil. But Kino has seen a future in which his son will go to school and learn to read and then they will all know the things that the Europeans know. They will know what is true.
Oh, that pearl seems to promise safety and security and never being hungry, and that is very difficult to resist.
Read this: "And the sun beat down on the streets of the city and even tiny stones threw shadows on the ground." What would you give to be able to write a sentence like that?
Here is another great tidbit from this novel: "He had said, 'I am a man,' and that meant certain things to Juana. It meant that he was half insane and half god." True dat, right sisters?
The thing that makes this book really great, aside from the talented and skillful writing, is that it rings completely true. Imagine if you won the lottery, and not just enough to pay off the bills, but some insanely huge amount, like $500 million. Some amount that would absolutely destroy your current life and send you hurtling into some other existence. Everyone knows you have the money, and they all want some of it -- and not a little bit. Does a little part of you hate them for their greed? Do you question everyone's motives in hanging around you? Do you have to shut yourself away from the world for security and safety? It's easy to imagine the bad side of sudden immense wealth. Steinbeck wrote something like, when we step into the sunlight, our shadow side is revealed as well. Something like The Pearl could bring out the worst in each of us.
Woo Hoo Hoo!! I completed my challenge of reading 104 books in 2009!! I'm pretty relieved to be done.
But... I have made a new challenge for myself for 2010. I hope it will begin some time tomorrow, and I think it will be a lot of fun, even though I'm just a little terrified.
Happy New Year's Eve! I hope you have fun and get home safely and get ready to start your resolutions tomorrow.
Labels:
books
Book 103: Notorious Victoria
Whew! I finished this one at about 1AM. It's a very readable biography of Victoria Claflin Woodhull Blood Martin, the first woman to run for President of the United States of America. That was in 1872, long before women had the right to vote (which came in 1920, if you've forgotten).
Often referred to as "The Woodhull" by the press, Victoria was scandalous and outrageous! She was ahead of her time (and still might be today in some areas). She divorced two husbands, but the first one lived with her and the second husband for some time. She was as involved in the Women's Movement as Susan B. Anthony, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, and Lucretia Mott, but she pissed them off so much that they completely wrote her out of their 900-page history!
She was nominated for the office of President on the Equal Rights Party ticket, with the famous Frederick Douglass nominated as Vice Presidential candidate. But, many Republicans were aghast at the thought of the re-election of the corrupt Ulysses S. Grant, and so they banded together to support Horace Greeley, leaving Victoria with little support. Besides that, she was not listed on the ballot due to being a woman AND being only 34 years old (one year shy of being legally able to hold the office). Grant won anyway.
She believed that women and men were equal and that women should have careers and be able to vote and run for public office. She and her sister, Tennessee Claflin, ran a brokerage house, published a newspaper, opened a school for teaching micro-agriculture to women, and was very involved in leading Spiritualist, Labor, and Women's groups.
Victoria was the first woman to address a committee of the U.S. Congress (arguing for women's suffrage). She was much admired by our well-known feminists at that time (Anthony, Stanton, etc.)
The Woodhull gave lectures all over the Eastern U.S. and in England about various topics, including women's suffrage, Spiritualism (by which I mean talking to ghosts), Unions, 8-hour workdays, the poor rising up to take back their wealth from the rich (she was aligned with communists for a while), and Free Love.
The feminists of the day possibly could have continued to support and appreciate The Woodhull if she had only:
* stuck to the topic of women's suffrage rather than getting involved in other areas of politics (labor, restructuring the government, etc.)
* kept quiet about her ability to speak to the dead, which was embarrassing
* kept quiet about Free Love. Victoria did not believe that a woman should be forced for survival to marry any man and have to submit to his unwanted sexual attentions. Women should marry for love and have sex because they want to -- she was truly a radical in the 1800s! Victoria had a love affair with Theodore Tilton during one of her marriages. Tilton revealed to her that his wife was sleeping with the Reverend Henry Ward Beecher, brother of Harriet Beecher Stowe (famous feminist).
When Victoria told the world that the Reverend was a Free Lover (to support her supposition that men are allowed to remain respectable while having sex outside of marriage, and women should be as well), all hell broke loose. Rev. Beecher never admitted to it publicly (though he did privately). Harriet Beecher Stowe was instrumental in kicking Victoria out of the feminist club as revenge.
PLUS, The Woodhull and her sister were imprisoned while being tried for libel after printing the story in their newspaper. But while imprisoned, "the other inmates agreed to refrain from smoking while the ladies were in residence." So at least there was that.
The Woodhull's story is very entertaining and amazing. How did this woman totally disappear from history? I have a minor in Women's Studies and I never heard of her. Re-write the books, Women's Historians! Don't let Harriet Beecher Stowe continue getting revenge forever.
Mary Gabriel's writing is almost conversational and easy, while always objective. Notorious Victoria is a great read.
Often referred to as "The Woodhull" by the press, Victoria was scandalous and outrageous! She was ahead of her time (and still might be today in some areas). She divorced two husbands, but the first one lived with her and the second husband for some time. She was as involved in the Women's Movement as Susan B. Anthony, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, and Lucretia Mott, but she pissed them off so much that they completely wrote her out of their 900-page history!
She was nominated for the office of President on the Equal Rights Party ticket, with the famous Frederick Douglass nominated as Vice Presidential candidate. But, many Republicans were aghast at the thought of the re-election of the corrupt Ulysses S. Grant, and so they banded together to support Horace Greeley, leaving Victoria with little support. Besides that, she was not listed on the ballot due to being a woman AND being only 34 years old (one year shy of being legally able to hold the office). Grant won anyway.
She believed that women and men were equal and that women should have careers and be able to vote and run for public office. She and her sister, Tennessee Claflin, ran a brokerage house, published a newspaper, opened a school for teaching micro-agriculture to women, and was very involved in leading Spiritualist, Labor, and Women's groups.
Victoria was the first woman to address a committee of the U.S. Congress (arguing for women's suffrage). She was much admired by our well-known feminists at that time (Anthony, Stanton, etc.)
The Woodhull gave lectures all over the Eastern U.S. and in England about various topics, including women's suffrage, Spiritualism (by which I mean talking to ghosts), Unions, 8-hour workdays, the poor rising up to take back their wealth from the rich (she was aligned with communists for a while), and Free Love.
The feminists of the day possibly could have continued to support and appreciate The Woodhull if she had only:
* stuck to the topic of women's suffrage rather than getting involved in other areas of politics (labor, restructuring the government, etc.)
* kept quiet about her ability to speak to the dead, which was embarrassing
* kept quiet about Free Love. Victoria did not believe that a woman should be forced for survival to marry any man and have to submit to his unwanted sexual attentions. Women should marry for love and have sex because they want to -- she was truly a radical in the 1800s! Victoria had a love affair with Theodore Tilton during one of her marriages. Tilton revealed to her that his wife was sleeping with the Reverend Henry Ward Beecher, brother of Harriet Beecher Stowe (famous feminist).
When Victoria told the world that the Reverend was a Free Lover (to support her supposition that men are allowed to remain respectable while having sex outside of marriage, and women should be as well), all hell broke loose. Rev. Beecher never admitted to it publicly (though he did privately). Harriet Beecher Stowe was instrumental in kicking Victoria out of the feminist club as revenge.
PLUS, The Woodhull and her sister were imprisoned while being tried for libel after printing the story in their newspaper. But while imprisoned, "the other inmates agreed to refrain from smoking while the ladies were in residence." So at least there was that.
The Woodhull's story is very entertaining and amazing. How did this woman totally disappear from history? I have a minor in Women's Studies and I never heard of her. Re-write the books, Women's Historians! Don't let Harriet Beecher Stowe continue getting revenge forever.
Mary Gabriel's writing is almost conversational and easy, while always objective. Notorious Victoria is a great read.
Labels:
books
Monday, December 28, 2009
Fun With Spelling
A local radio station keeps advertising an upcoming concert at a venue near Denver. The venue has been renamed, and the DJ said, "at the Odium."
I was all, "WHA??" Why would you name an event center "The Odium"??? That means something horrible, and hated, and dreaded! That doesn't make any sense at all. If it were some kind of heavy metal club or a Goth parlor or something, it would make sense. But this place has concerts and horse shows and UFC MMA events.
*** just a quick aside to mention an episode of The Simpsons that I saw last night, in which Marge objects to MMA fighting and says, "Just because this isn't my taste, I think no one should be able to enjoy it." And then she and some other meddlers picket outside the arena and my favorite picket sign said, "UNMIX the Martial Arts!" ***
Anyway, I confirmed my definition, and sure enough, "Odium" comes from Latin and refers to something that is hated, detested, and makes people angry.
Then I thought: I'd better just double-check.
So I looked up the word Odium AND the city name, and guess what. It's spelled ODEUM, which comes from Greek and means a theater or concert hall.
Now THAT makes sense.
.
I was all, "WHA??" Why would you name an event center "The Odium"??? That means something horrible, and hated, and dreaded! That doesn't make any sense at all. If it were some kind of heavy metal club or a Goth parlor or something, it would make sense. But this place has concerts and horse shows and UFC MMA events.
*** just a quick aside to mention an episode of The Simpsons that I saw last night, in which Marge objects to MMA fighting and says, "Just because this isn't my taste, I think no one should be able to enjoy it." And then she and some other meddlers picket outside the arena and my favorite picket sign said, "UNMIX the Martial Arts!" ***
Anyway, I confirmed my definition, and sure enough, "Odium" comes from Latin and refers to something that is hated, detested, and makes people angry.
Then I thought: I'd better just double-check.
So I looked up the word Odium AND the city name, and guess what. It's spelled ODEUM, which comes from Greek and means a theater or concert hall.
Now THAT makes sense.
.
Book 102: Pilgrim At Tinker Creek
This book by Annie Dillard took me a long time to read. It's not because I didn't enjoy it, but just because it's a book best savored. I'm so out of the habit of quickly reading and digesting serious material that I have to read slowly and break it up into smaller installments. I can still read easy fiction at hyper-speed, just not serious books.
I first read this book about 10 years ago, and I liked it then, and I liked it this year. Dillard lived for a year in Virginia, near Tinker Creek. She read and walked around and looked at nature and thought. Doesn't that sound great? It was the '70s, so she surely wasn't as addicted to technology as many of us are these days -- it wouldn't have felt quite so foreign to live more in nature.
Dillard tells little stories about nature and Nature and science and God and horrors and beauty. Her prose is just right to reflect a young woman who is extremely excited about life and science and nature. This book won the Pulitzer Prize.
Some of my favorite parts:
* She tells of a man who measured the pressure exerted by a growing squash. It was 5 thousand pounds per square inch! It made me wonder if the pressure of a growing baby is the same, but of course we could never hook a baby up to a machine to measure the pressure exerted by its growing body. Dillard makes you think of weird experiments. You won't be able to help it.
* She writes of human beings, "Our excessive emotions are so patently painful and harmful to us as a species that I can hardly believe that they evolved." If we were all lobotomized, we could all be happy.
* Here's a perfect line, "I felt a rush of such pure energy I thought I would not need to breathe for days."
* On navel gazing: "I wonder if we do not waste most of our energy just by spending every waking minute saying hello to ourselves."
* I love her description of a muskrat-watching adventure, in which she is lying on a bridge close to the water, trying not to move when the animal can see her, but rolling back and forth to watch him as he swims back and forth under the bridge. "All this time I was not only doing an elaborate about-face every time his eyes disappeared under the bridge, but I was also smoking a cigarette." Ah, the 1970's when cigarettes and nature could be combined without irony!
I love Annie Dillard and highly recommend her books.
I first read this book about 10 years ago, and I liked it then, and I liked it this year. Dillard lived for a year in Virginia, near Tinker Creek. She read and walked around and looked at nature and thought. Doesn't that sound great? It was the '70s, so she surely wasn't as addicted to technology as many of us are these days -- it wouldn't have felt quite so foreign to live more in nature.
Dillard tells little stories about nature and Nature and science and God and horrors and beauty. Her prose is just right to reflect a young woman who is extremely excited about life and science and nature. This book won the Pulitzer Prize.
Some of my favorite parts:
* She tells of a man who measured the pressure exerted by a growing squash. It was 5 thousand pounds per square inch! It made me wonder if the pressure of a growing baby is the same, but of course we could never hook a baby up to a machine to measure the pressure exerted by its growing body. Dillard makes you think of weird experiments. You won't be able to help it.
* She writes of human beings, "Our excessive emotions are so patently painful and harmful to us as a species that I can hardly believe that they evolved." If we were all lobotomized, we could all be happy.
* Here's a perfect line, "I felt a rush of such pure energy I thought I would not need to breathe for days."
* On navel gazing: "I wonder if we do not waste most of our energy just by spending every waking minute saying hello to ourselves."
* I love her description of a muskrat-watching adventure, in which she is lying on a bridge close to the water, trying not to move when the animal can see her, but rolling back and forth to watch him as he swims back and forth under the bridge. "All this time I was not only doing an elaborate about-face every time his eyes disappeared under the bridge, but I was also smoking a cigarette." Ah, the 1970's when cigarettes and nature could be combined without irony!
I love Annie Dillard and highly recommend her books.
Labels:
books
Friday, December 25, 2009
Book 101: Under The Dome
I couldn't resist this huge tome from Stephen King, even though I need to read quickly to finish my challenge! It's 1072 pages long, but it went fast anyway.
The premise is that a little town in the Northeastern U.S. is one day trapped, inexplicably, under an invisible dome. No one can get in or out. Water and gases can slowly trickle through, but heat and pollution are building up after only a couple of days. The military can't breach it and no one knows what to do.
There's a bit more of a supernatural element to it, but I won't ruin the surprise for you. Mostly, King sticks to what he's great at: developing characters who seem real and pitting them against each other.
There is a really, really bad guy who is GLAD for the Dome because he would love to take over as dictator. There are other bad guys and stupid guys who help the Bad Man and enjoy the hateful, childish tormenting of the good guys.
There are the good guys and the medium-good people who try to help each other and stop the bad guys, and some just aren't trying to hurt anyone.
King builds the plot up until the reader wishes to go to that town and kill the bad guys herself. But instead, all she can do is keep reading and trust that an appropriate fate awaits the baddies.
It is fun, imaginative, and entertaining. King's still got it.
The premise is that a little town in the Northeastern U.S. is one day trapped, inexplicably, under an invisible dome. No one can get in or out. Water and gases can slowly trickle through, but heat and pollution are building up after only a couple of days. The military can't breach it and no one knows what to do.
There's a bit more of a supernatural element to it, but I won't ruin the surprise for you. Mostly, King sticks to what he's great at: developing characters who seem real and pitting them against each other.
There is a really, really bad guy who is GLAD for the Dome because he would love to take over as dictator. There are other bad guys and stupid guys who help the Bad Man and enjoy the hateful, childish tormenting of the good guys.
There are the good guys and the medium-good people who try to help each other and stop the bad guys, and some just aren't trying to hurt anyone.
King builds the plot up until the reader wishes to go to that town and kill the bad guys herself. But instead, all she can do is keep reading and trust that an appropriate fate awaits the baddies.
It is fun, imaginative, and entertaining. King's still got it.
Labels:
books
Thursday, December 24, 2009
Truffles: First Attempt
One day, earlier this month, I suddenly became VERY INTERESTED in making chocolate truffles. I'm sure that reading the sequel to Chocolat played a role in this obsession. I found a few recipes, including this one for Honey Vanilla Chocolate Truffles from Martha Stewart. I rounded up all the chocolate and what-not that I needed, and set to work.
I envisioned beautiful chocolates that I could package and give as gifts, wowing people left and right!
Well, the Honey Vanilla Chocolate Truffles turned out DELICIOUS! But I thought they were too ugly to share, even when sprinkled with colored sugar. Even the one that was rolled in chopped slivered almonds. With practice, and maybe with something called Luster Dust (which I hear was invented as an edible body paint-type thing, but then got co-opted by bakers), perhaps I can make attractive truffles next year.
The OTHER batch I made was just regular chocolate truffles, except that I added some peanut butter to the mixture. Well, I did it WRONG, WRONG, WRONG! My ganache never hardened. It spent the night in the freezer and was still too soft to roll into balls.
But it tasted really, really good. So, I did what I had to do. I made some yellow cupcakes and used the peanut butter ganache as icing and it was so, so good!
They may look ugly, but my taste buds did not mind at all.
Lessons learned:
*The first time I make something, I should follow a recipe instead of winging it.
*But sometimes winging it leads to a great cupcake icing or other surprise treat.
*And if you make ugly candy and are forced to eat it instead of giving it away, YOU GET TO EAT A BUNCH OF CANDY! And cupcakes!
I envisioned beautiful chocolates that I could package and give as gifts, wowing people left and right!
Well, the Honey Vanilla Chocolate Truffles turned out DELICIOUS! But I thought they were too ugly to share, even when sprinkled with colored sugar. Even the one that was rolled in chopped slivered almonds. With practice, and maybe with something called Luster Dust (which I hear was invented as an edible body paint-type thing, but then got co-opted by bakers), perhaps I can make attractive truffles next year.
The OTHER batch I made was just regular chocolate truffles, except that I added some peanut butter to the mixture. Well, I did it WRONG, WRONG, WRONG! My ganache never hardened. It spent the night in the freezer and was still too soft to roll into balls.
But it tasted really, really good. So, I did what I had to do. I made some yellow cupcakes and used the peanut butter ganache as icing and it was so, so good!
They may look ugly, but my taste buds did not mind at all.
Lessons learned:
*The first time I make something, I should follow a recipe instead of winging it.
*But sometimes winging it leads to a great cupcake icing or other surprise treat.
*And if you make ugly candy and are forced to eat it instead of giving it away, YOU GET TO EAT A BUNCH OF CANDY! And cupcakes!
Labels:
food
A Few Simple Ornaments
These are really simple to make: just cut out two layers of felt for the main shape. Sew any decorations onto one layer with matching embroidery floss (making all knots on the back), and then sew the two layers together (all knots will be in the middle).
You can sew the ribbon on with embroidery floss as you sew the two layers together, or use sewing thread to attach the ribbon once the ornament is done. I think the thinner ribbon looks better (as opposed to the Gingerbread Man's thicker ribbon).
Gingerbread Man and Snowman
Back sides
Crooked Star (you may want to make a perfect template rather than cutting yours out freehand). I like crooked, but not everyone does!
Stocking: I sewed green pieces on top of a red sock shape.
Candy Cane: I sewed white stripes on top of a red cane shape.
Tree: is it weird to put a tree ornament on a tree? Should I have made tiny tree ornaments to decorate the tree ornament? And so on! When would it ever end?
You can sew the ribbon on with embroidery floss as you sew the two layers together, or use sewing thread to attach the ribbon once the ornament is done. I think the thinner ribbon looks better (as opposed to the Gingerbread Man's thicker ribbon).
Gingerbread Man and Snowman
Back sides
Crooked Star (you may want to make a perfect template rather than cutting yours out freehand). I like crooked, but not everyone does!
Stocking: I sewed green pieces on top of a red sock shape.
Candy Cane: I sewed white stripes on top of a red cane shape.
Tree: is it weird to put a tree ornament on a tree? Should I have made tiny tree ornaments to decorate the tree ornament? And so on! When would it ever end?
Labels:
crafts
Sunday, December 20, 2009
Book 100: Girl With A Pearl Earring
This novel by Tracy Chevalier is set in Delft, The Netherlands, in the 1660s. You may have seen the movie based on this book, which stars Scarlett Johansson.
The plot is that a young woman's family hits hard times and she must go to work as a maid in Vermeer's house. She struggles with doing as Vermeer asks without offending his wife. She must avoid a handsy patron and deal with her impatient future husband. And her worst enemy may be a 7-year old girl who likes to cause trouble.
Chevalier's writing is excellent. She develops characters well and times the plot nicely. It is fun to read about Delft in the 1660s. It brings back memories of touring Amsterdam several years ago. I never saw Delft, but I think there are many similarities between the cities. I was able to go on a tour of Rembrandt's house, which is being restored with historical accuracy. He also painted portraits in the 1600s, but in Amsterdam. Chevalier's descriptions of Vermeer's house meld with my memories of Rembrandt's house to create a very full, vivid experience. I love it when it all comes together!
Four books to go! I couldn't resist starting Under the Dome, which has over 1,070 pages! The other three are already started, as well: Steinbeck's The Pearl, Dillard's Pilgrim at Tinker Creek, and Notorious Victoria (author's name temporarily forgotten).
The plot is that a young woman's family hits hard times and she must go to work as a maid in Vermeer's house. She struggles with doing as Vermeer asks without offending his wife. She must avoid a handsy patron and deal with her impatient future husband. And her worst enemy may be a 7-year old girl who likes to cause trouble.
Chevalier's writing is excellent. She develops characters well and times the plot nicely. It is fun to read about Delft in the 1660s. It brings back memories of touring Amsterdam several years ago. I never saw Delft, but I think there are many similarities between the cities. I was able to go on a tour of Rembrandt's house, which is being restored with historical accuracy. He also painted portraits in the 1600s, but in Amsterdam. Chevalier's descriptions of Vermeer's house meld with my memories of Rembrandt's house to create a very full, vivid experience. I love it when it all comes together!
Four books to go! I couldn't resist starting Under the Dome, which has over 1,070 pages! The other three are already started, as well: Steinbeck's The Pearl, Dillard's Pilgrim at Tinker Creek, and Notorious Victoria (author's name temporarily forgotten).
Labels:
books
Thursday, December 17, 2009
Goodbye, Junk!
We sorted and re-sorted and debated and hemmed and hawed, and finally we made a finished DONATE PILE. Then it sat in the garage for a couple months until I finally called a local thrift store that does pick-ups. Then we waited two weeks for the big day to arrive.
We got up at the crack of dawn to put it all outside and tape signs on the items and boxes. The picker-uppers could arrive at any time between 7:30AM and 5:00PM. How convenient!
At the last minute, an old bicycle was begrudgingly added to the pile after much consternation. Possibly it could have been altered and made into some sort of single-speed cruiser. But it would still be too small and it would still be a third bike for only two people. BUT again, it was much beloved and had been expensive when purchased 15 years ago. HOWEVER, it would probably never be ridden again, and it's not that easy to store bicycles. ON THE OTHER HAND, he loved it.
Well, I was able to watch the pick-up through the window when the doods showed up at about 10:00AM. They parked their giant truck in the parking lot behind our place, rather than pulling into the alley. So they had to take everything over a curb, and down a small hill to get it to the truck. They insisted on carrying two items at a time, which was unfortunate.
For one thing, DOOD #1 totally dropped the box that contained a perfect, complete coffee service set. All the pieces were wrapped in newspaper, but that couldn't protect them from a harsh fall, a tumble down the hill, and then being thrown back into the box. I had never used the set, but had I known that DOOD #1 would break 1/4 of the pieces on the way to the truck, I probably would have held on to it and pretended that some day I would have people over and serve them coffee by pouring the coffee from the brewing pot into the serving pot, and pouring milk from the plastic jug into the little milk pitcher, and filling the sugar bowl from the sugar bag that's inside a ziploc bag. AND serving little cups of coffee upon matching saucers. Yeah, right.
Poor DOOD #1 was trying to carry that coffee service box along with a dismantled CD rack, which is very tricky to move around and really requires 2 - 6 hands.
Next, DOOD #1 grabbed a heavy box full of books AND the microwave oven at the same time. I have to admit that I was and still am slightly aghast that he carried the microwave BY THE CORD! Oh my God! You never, ever, EVER carry an appliance by the cord! That was a perfectly good microwave, and CLEAN! And it had a glass plate in the bottom, on which to sit your food item so that it could rotate around and heat evenly. That glass plate is probably broken now, but I guess that doesn't matter if the electric cord was ripped out of the thing.
Finally, DOOD #2 carried some over-the-door shoe racks and the beloved bicycle at the same time, but tripping over the curb on his way down the hill must have pissed him off, and he literally threw the bike into the truck, right on top of all our breakable donatables. Poor bikey.
So, I know that it was all stuff that we didn't want (excepting maybe the bike, kinda sorta), and it doesn't matter what happens to it as long as it's gone. But part of being able to let go of it was the belief that someone would get some use out of it, and that it could maybe help some people. If I ever try to purge again, I will have to forget about this experience. Half the stuff you donate just gets ruined by the employees! Imagine what happens at the Great Sorting Warehouse!
I guess the other reason I was so surprised was that the lady on the phone who set up the pick-up for me GRILLED me about the condition of the donation items. Are they clean? Does everything work? Would you give them to someone you know?
She's probably wondering why half the stuff they get is broken and the other half needs to be re-wired. Why do all the bikes look like they got thrown into a truck? At least the over-the-door shoe racks seemed to be intact -- some thrift store customer out there must have some shoes that need organizing.
Tuesday, December 15, 2009
TOO high
Here's an SUV we saw in a parking lot and I couldn't resist embarrassing Jason by posing next to it. I'm almost 6 feet tall, and would have some trouble getting into it -- how do the owners climb in?
I tried to stall and hang around to see the giant rednecks who drive it, but alas, we never spotted them.
And seriously, doesn't that kind of alteration make an SUV 97% likely to tip over when going around the gentlest curve? What is the point of it?
Monday, December 14, 2009
New Dress
I finished sewing this dress the other day.
I'm not that experienced with making sleeves, so I'm thrilled with how they turned out.
The pattern is McCall's M5576. The fabric is Echino by Etsuko Furuya Fall 2009 Ornament Turquoise. It's a linen and cotton blend, and I love it, but I think this dress would have been better with a little stretch. It turns out that I am not very good at being ladylike. Wearing this dress, I am very aware of how often I make big movements: reaching, stretching, picking up heavy things, running up and down stairs, etc... In this dress, I have to be a little more calm or I will rip the seams apart, Hulk-style.
I'm not that experienced with making sleeves, so I'm thrilled with how they turned out.
The pattern is McCall's M5576. The fabric is Echino by Etsuko Furuya Fall 2009 Ornament Turquoise. It's a linen and cotton blend, and I love it, but I think this dress would have been better with a little stretch. It turns out that I am not very good at being ladylike. Wearing this dress, I am very aware of how often I make big movements: reaching, stretching, picking up heavy things, running up and down stairs, etc... In this dress, I have to be a little more calm or I will rip the seams apart, Hulk-style.
Labels:
sewing
Saturday, December 12, 2009
Book 99: Poppy Done to Death
This is my last Charlaine Harris book -- until she writes some more. In this one, Aurora's step-sister-in-law is murdered, and guess who finds the body! It's Aurora, like in every book!
Well, sister Poppy has been having affairs with everyone, and our heroine is pretty disgusted. The disgust and the multiple suspects make it even trickier to figure out who killed Poppy.
Additionally, Aurora has a little half-brother. They share the same cheating father. Little brother is now a teenager and he comes for a visit, complicating and livening up Aurora's Thanksgiving plans/murder solving.
It's the same kind of deal you expect from Charlaine Harris (just seeing her name makes me want to speak in an outrageous parody of a Southern accent: Sharrr-LAYYYNE!). The characters are much more important and interesting than the mysteries. The characters are pretty well-drawn, and the mysteries are not. I have just discovered that this type of novel is called a "cozy." They usually take place in small towns, and the mysteries are solved by female amateur sleuths. There's not much graphic description of blood, violence, or sex. There's little to no cursing (or as I call it, cussin'). It's a whole genre that I never knew existed.
Thanks to this quick read, I am officially now CAUGHT UP and only have to read 5 more books by the end of the year. I'm horribly tempted by a couple of 1,000-pagers that are weighing down my shelves, but I'll try to wait until after Book 104.
Well, sister Poppy has been having affairs with everyone, and our heroine is pretty disgusted. The disgust and the multiple suspects make it even trickier to figure out who killed Poppy.
Additionally, Aurora has a little half-brother. They share the same cheating father. Little brother is now a teenager and he comes for a visit, complicating and livening up Aurora's Thanksgiving plans/murder solving.
It's the same kind of deal you expect from Charlaine Harris (just seeing her name makes me want to speak in an outrageous parody of a Southern accent: Sharrr-LAYYYNE!). The characters are much more important and interesting than the mysteries. The characters are pretty well-drawn, and the mysteries are not. I have just discovered that this type of novel is called a "cozy." They usually take place in small towns, and the mysteries are solved by female amateur sleuths. There's not much graphic description of blood, violence, or sex. There's little to no cursing (or as I call it, cussin'). It's a whole genre that I never knew existed.
Thanks to this quick read, I am officially now CAUGHT UP and only have to read 5 more books by the end of the year. I'm horribly tempted by a couple of 1,000-pagers that are weighing down my shelves, but I'll try to wait until after Book 104.
Labels:
books
Thursday, December 10, 2009
Books 97 & 98: A Fool And His Honey & Last Scene Alive
Oh, Charlaine Harris, your Aurora Teagarden novels continue to move me closer to my reading goal!
In A Fool and His Honey, Aurora has to watch over an abandoned baby, try to figure out the parentage of the baby, travel to the North (Ohio), see how useless a father her husband would be, and solve a tacked-on second mystery. As usual, it's fun to read about the characters. The secondary mystery was quite unfulfilling and very much seemed like an afterthought.
In Last Scene Alive, Aurora is a widow. She's also dealing with the film crew that's making a movie of her own experience of almost being murdered! But guess what, the script was written by her ex-flame, Robin Crusoe, who helped her solve her very first mystery. Someone dies, and someone has a secret past, and Aurora meddles in it all while being pursued romantically by multiple men (typical set-up from Harris).
I liked when Aurora mentioned that with her glasses on, she could hear better when she talked on the phone. She also talks later about being without her glasses, saying, "I am never at my most alert when the whole world is a blur." Now, I'm not nearly as blind as she is supposed to be, but it is true that I feel pretty out of sorts without my glasses or contacts. The last time I went to the eye doctor, she did some looking in my eyes and then didn't give me my glasses back. I honestly had a little bit of trouble talking to her without my corrected vision. I felt very vulnerable and a little bit stupid. So, kudos to Charlaine for capturing such a true detail. She does that kind of thing a lot, actually.
I only have one more Harris novel to finish, and I'll be caught up! Only 5 more books needed after that to reach my goal of 104. I'm pretty sure I'll make it. I can't wait to read LONG books again next year, or maybe magazines! Or watch movies! But I will miss having the excuse: "I can't do XYZ! I've got to read for my blog!" That has been pretty nice.
In A Fool and His Honey, Aurora has to watch over an abandoned baby, try to figure out the parentage of the baby, travel to the North (Ohio), see how useless a father her husband would be, and solve a tacked-on second mystery. As usual, it's fun to read about the characters. The secondary mystery was quite unfulfilling and very much seemed like an afterthought.
In Last Scene Alive, Aurora is a widow. She's also dealing with the film crew that's making a movie of her own experience of almost being murdered! But guess what, the script was written by her ex-flame, Robin Crusoe, who helped her solve her very first mystery. Someone dies, and someone has a secret past, and Aurora meddles in it all while being pursued romantically by multiple men (typical set-up from Harris).
I liked when Aurora mentioned that with her glasses on, she could hear better when she talked on the phone. She also talks later about being without her glasses, saying, "I am never at my most alert when the whole world is a blur." Now, I'm not nearly as blind as she is supposed to be, but it is true that I feel pretty out of sorts without my glasses or contacts. The last time I went to the eye doctor, she did some looking in my eyes and then didn't give me my glasses back. I honestly had a little bit of trouble talking to her without my corrected vision. I felt very vulnerable and a little bit stupid. So, kudos to Charlaine for capturing such a true detail. She does that kind of thing a lot, actually.
I only have one more Harris novel to finish, and I'll be caught up! Only 5 more books needed after that to reach my goal of 104. I'm pretty sure I'll make it. I can't wait to read LONG books again next year, or maybe magazines! Or watch movies! But I will miss having the excuse: "I can't do XYZ! I've got to read for my blog!" That has been pretty nice.
Labels:
books
Tuesday, December 8, 2009
Books 94, 95, 96: Three Bedrooms, One Corpse; The Julius House; Dead Over Heels
These are three more novels in the Aurora Teagarden series by Charlaine Harris. These quick reads are really helping me get caught up on my goal of reading 104 books by the end of the year!
As usual with Harris's work, these are character-driven much more than plot-driven. Aurora is a fun and interesting character. She dresses and styles herself in just as poor taste as does Sookie Stackhouse. She is a tiny little librarian who is often stumbling upon dead bodies. Aurora also loves mystery novels and true crimes, so she enjoys trying to solve all the murders that happen near her.
In these three novels, she looks for a new house to buy, dumps her minister boyfriend for a more exciting man, and finds the Realtor Murderer (I made up that nickname just now, just for you). She gets married, takes ownership of a house with a mysterious past, and discovers some unwelcome secrets about her husband. She finds the corpse of a man she has hated for years, fights with a fellow librarian, sees a stabbing, and is pursued romantically by a few men other than her husband.
Even though death, betrayal, assault, and hatred are major themes in these, they still remain rather light-hearted and are very easy to read. And thank goodness, because I don't think I would reach my mass-reading goal without them!
As usual with Harris's work, these are character-driven much more than plot-driven. Aurora is a fun and interesting character. She dresses and styles herself in just as poor taste as does Sookie Stackhouse. She is a tiny little librarian who is often stumbling upon dead bodies. Aurora also loves mystery novels and true crimes, so she enjoys trying to solve all the murders that happen near her.
In these three novels, she looks for a new house to buy, dumps her minister boyfriend for a more exciting man, and finds the Realtor Murderer (I made up that nickname just now, just for you). She gets married, takes ownership of a house with a mysterious past, and discovers some unwelcome secrets about her husband. She finds the corpse of a man she has hated for years, fights with a fellow librarian, sees a stabbing, and is pursued romantically by a few men other than her husband.
Even though death, betrayal, assault, and hatred are major themes in these, they still remain rather light-hearted and are very easy to read. And thank goodness, because I don't think I would reach my mass-reading goal without them!
Labels:
books
Saturday, December 5, 2009
Book 93: A Bone To Pick
This is book #2 in the Aurora Teagarden series, by Charlaine Harris of Sookie Stackhouse fame. In this episode, the tiny librarian inherits a house and half a million dollars from a casual friend from her murder club. The Real Murders club, which disbanded in the first novel, was a group of people who loved reading and talking about true crimes.
In this book, Aurora discovers a human skull in her new house and has to figure out who the murderer is AND who the victim was.
As usual in Charlaine's work, the dialogue is stilted and unrealistic, but the characters are fun, and you want to find out what happens to them. In this one, the whole mystery is suddenly solved with no subtlety or finesse. I'll still read the rest of the series, even though I have some complaints about her writing.
In this book, Aurora discovers a human skull in her new house and has to figure out who the murderer is AND who the victim was.
As usual in Charlaine's work, the dialogue is stilted and unrealistic, but the characters are fun, and you want to find out what happens to them. In this one, the whole mystery is suddenly solved with no subtlety or finesse. I'll still read the rest of the series, even though I have some complaints about her writing.
Labels:
books
Friday, December 4, 2009
Book 92: The Girl With No Shadow
This is Joanne Harris's sequel to Chocolat.
Vianne and her daughter, Anouk, have been on the run for a few years, changing their names and their background stories, and raising little Rosette, Vianne's second daughter. They have stopped doing magic/witchcraft and are being as normal and boring as possible.
Then they meet their match: a woman who travels around, stealing identities and practicing her own brand of magic/witchcraft, with spells and symbols and charms. She moves into their lives -- too far into their lives.
The writing is lyrical and mystical. Vianne's still making chocolates and the descriptions might lead readers into chocolate binges.
The major theme is Identity. Can you change yours? Can you just become someone else and be happy? Can you deny your true self? Yes, no, and no, of course. If you liked the first book, you'll probably like this one, too. It's a fun, exciting story about magic mixed with modern life's text messages, security cameras, and internet searches.
Vianne and her daughter, Anouk, have been on the run for a few years, changing their names and their background stories, and raising little Rosette, Vianne's second daughter. They have stopped doing magic/witchcraft and are being as normal and boring as possible.
Then they meet their match: a woman who travels around, stealing identities and practicing her own brand of magic/witchcraft, with spells and symbols and charms. She moves into their lives -- too far into their lives.
The writing is lyrical and mystical. Vianne's still making chocolates and the descriptions might lead readers into chocolate binges.
The major theme is Identity. Can you change yours? Can you just become someone else and be happy? Can you deny your true self? Yes, no, and no, of course. If you liked the first book, you'll probably like this one, too. It's a fun, exciting story about magic mixed with modern life's text messages, security cameras, and internet searches.
Labels:
books
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)